Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Test] fix test setup on ANet tests #15908

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 2, 2019

Conversation

eileenmcnaughton
Copy link
Contributor

Overview

Test set up fix, including fixing Order.create to support being chained

Before

Test set up creates invalid Order & hence tests to ensure Order is correct fail

After

Test uses methods that create valid transactions. In order to support it I had to fix Order.create to support being chained

Technical Details

Per #15706 the setup for this test
is creating invalid transactions. This fixes - I had to do an order fix in the process

Comments

Issue exposed in #15706

@civibot
Copy link

civibot bot commented Nov 21, 2019

(Standard links)

@civibot civibot bot added the master label Nov 21, 2019
@mlutfy
Copy link
Member

mlutfy commented Nov 27, 2019

jenkins, test this please

I'm not sure if the test fails are related:

    CRM_Export_BAO_ExportTest.testGetSQLColumnsAndHeaders with data set #5
    CRM_Export_BAO_ExportTest.testExportComponentsMembership
    CRM_Member_Selector_SearchTest.testSelectorGetRows

@eileenmcnaughton
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mlutfy yep - it was an e-notice - should be fixed now

Per civicrm#15706 the setup for this test
is creating invalid transactions. This fixes - I had to do an order fix in the process
@eileenmcnaughton
Copy link
Contributor Author

test this please

@eileenmcnaughton
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mlutfy this is passing now!

@mlutfy mlutfy merged commit 3943019 into civicrm:master Dec 2, 2019
@eileenmcnaughton eileenmcnaughton deleted the anet_setup branch December 2, 2019 21:26
@mlutfy
Copy link
Member

mlutfy commented Dec 2, 2019

🎉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants